its a track car, and i can see what your guna say "comfort isn't important on the track" but at the end of the day I would rather. have a car that is comfortable to drive and one that every suspension link bolt hole won't be flogged out
I think he mentioned it was track onoly now that it got defected.
And rose joints wont make it much more harsh.
But interestingly, My whole IRS rear end is rose jointed, aswell as the front LCAs, its smoother to drive than my hilux still...
its a track car, and i can see what your guna say "comfort isn't important on the track" but at the end of the day I would rather. have a car that is comfortable to drive and one that every suspension link bolt hole won't be flogged out
The holes wont get flogged out, thats a silly assumption.
But still, bushes are fine. No real need to go rose joints, as long as the car handles the way you want its all good
thanx man for the agreeance and yes it is only an assumption, i just thought things would get ugly with nowhere for the stresses to golike usual bushes
curious why you only ran the one position for the top arms? severly limits the tuneability of the back end??? and all the effort with no watts?? missed oppurtunity imo...
RIP Carly - a smile to light the world.
06/07/2011
jsut saying, for cars that have like 10-30mm if that of travel in the rear i dont see how a panhard wouldnt be enough(worth going watts) im sure you have a reason
legite assumption, but if you are going to the effort of equal legnth, then obciously handling is of importance, and id argue its just as useless in terms of improvements as a watts with only 10 - 30mm travel
RIP Carly - a smile to light the world.
06/07/2011
first time its driven in a while, just jimmied up to get it moveable, motor kicked into life first turn of the key
Equal the thing is decked arm angles where bullshit and it was axle tramping hard at EC
panhard will do the job just fine, things for sliding not tsukuba