Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Optimal lower control arms angle?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Name
    Tom
    State
    WA
    Location
    SOR
    Country
    Australia
    Posts
    195

    Default Optimal lower control arms angle?

    Hi everyone,

    For good handling what is the optimal angle of the front lower control arms? on my car with no RCA it currently sits horizontal/parallel to the ground would I see any improvement by installing an RCA to lower the arms slightly?

    Tom
    Last edited by Tom86; 29th April 2011 at 11:24 PM.

  2. #2
    Veteran AJPS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Name
    David
    State
    SA
    Location
    Lonsdale
    Country
    Australia
    Posts
    4,245

    Default

    how low is your car?
    - 10 year anniversary Tshirts http://www.ae86drivingclub.com.au/fo...irts-group-buy -

    Garage sale http://www.ae86drivingclub.com.au/fo...3-autumn-sales Specials on front end kits - pm me


  3. #3
    Veteran Skylar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Name
    Ken
    State
    WA
    Location
    Perth
    Country
    Australia
    Posts
    1,370

    Default

    Lower control arm angle controls two vital suspension factors among other things. They are front roll centre and camber gain through body roll.

    You want the roll axis to be parallel to mass centroid; and I'm guessing since we aren't going to be moving rear roll centre down to suit the front, you're going to have to bring the front up. I done the maths before in an excel sheet to figure out the roll centre locations on lowered corollas, I'll dig it up if you're really interested. The engineer said something around 3-5 F and 7-9 is ideal.

    When the arms are parallel to the ground, the wheel will lose (go towards + camber) when the wheel moves up into the well. So along with the body roll causing pos camber, the outside wheel will move up into the arch making the wheel lose more camber and decreasing your contact patch. The band-aid to this is to run more static camber than necessary.

  4. #4
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Name
    Adan
    State
    NSW
    Location
    Oxley Park
    Country
    Australia
    Posts
    1,082

    Default

    Aim to get them pretty much parallel to the ground, or slightly angled down if your springs arent very stiff.

    Obviously it depends on what you want to achieve and how far you want to get into it, but Id say thats a pretty good place to start as a rough guide.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Stain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Name
    Derek
    State
    QLD
    Location
    Far North
    Country
    Australia
    Posts
    645

    Default

    Would be interested to have a look at that info Skylar.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Name
    Tom
    State
    WA
    Location
    SOR
    Country
    Australia
    Posts
    195

    Default

    The car is not really low there is a 1.5-2cm gap between the tire and the lowest part of the wheel arch.

    I'm running a Greddy coilover suspensions with 8kg front and 6kg rear with -2.5 camber. The arms at the moment are parallel to the to the ground.

    I think Skylar might be on to something here about getting positive camber when the arms are parallel to the ground as I often get the feeling as if the inside wheel is folding inward when I hit a bump mid corner.
    So I'm thinking if I install an RCA and push the arms further downward this would give the arms extra room to move so the wheel won't go up into the well when the suspension is compressed and therefore no positive camber?

    Am I on the right track?

  7. #7
    Veteran Skylar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Name
    Ken
    State
    WA
    Location
    Perth
    Country
    Australia
    Posts
    1,370

    Default

    Stain, Ima have to get back to you on that. You want a ride height vs roll centre chart? + another with say 40mm rca installed?

    Tom, yeah, ideally you want to take the spring out and plot wheel travel vs camber to figure out how much static camber you should have for how much body roll you get/how much camber you gain through body roll but just throwing RCA's in would be a good start. and by putting RCA's in, the front will roll less and your camber change will be less than before. Like if you lost 2deg at 1g cornering, you'll only gain 1deg after installing the RCA and making the front 'harder' in roll.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 25th August 2011, 03:15 PM
  2. Lower Control Arms
    By adds in forum Cars or Parts Wanted
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 17th December 2010, 04:43 PM
  3. xt130 lower control arms
    By seeknsqueek in forum Car Parts For Sale
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 28th September 2007, 05:58 PM
  4. lower control arms and steering arms
    By sprinters_r_mad in forum Technical - Questions
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 19th March 2007, 12:13 PM
  5. lower control arms
    By starni_boy in forum Technical - Questions
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 15th February 2007, 09:04 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •