Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: Lightweight crank pulleys....

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Name
    Dave
    State
    QLD
    Location
    Brisbane
    Country
    Australia
    Posts
    2,667

    Default

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Gilly @ May 27 2008, 10:53 PM) </div>thats interesting you should mention that gilly, i always had it in my mind that when people "added another pulley to up their boost" they got a smaller pulley for the supercharger end.

    i know ive heard of people getting "a bigger pulley" but never occurred to me.....oh well learn something new everyday!

    as for your question, I'm not exactly sure hey.

    from what i remmeber, it wasn't the fact that the solid ones were heavy/lighter it was the fact that they didn't have the rubber inbetween the layers of steel.

    the harmonic balancer is acting as a mass damper system on the shaft (look up mass damper in relation to the formula 1's, this was my project, very cool also)

    so mass damper is essentially a mass attached to the end of a spring (mass being the outside of the harmonic balancer, spring being the rubber inbetween, in the simple case these are the 2 variables)

    like everything this will have a natural frequency, so essentially is what the system vibrates at if its left to its own devices, ie if you smack it with a hammer it will vibrate at a certain frequency (same as the tuning forks in primary school music, or when you smack a lump of metal and you get a certain noise out of it)

    so the harmonic balancer would have been "tuned" for a specific frequency in order to "Damper" the out of ballance-ness of the engine.

    now if you add a bigger pulley, you would be changing the weight of the pulley, and thus changing the natural freuquency of the system. and thus changing what frequencies the mass-damper system is able to damp out of the engine.

    so my thinking is that, the only thing that changing the pulley will do, is change the frequency range that the mass damper is working.

    as for if this is bad, i have no idea, it would depend entirely on where the new "damping frequency range" is. if originally it was designed to have a natural frequency at 5000rpm, and with the extra weight its now at like 10000rpm, then its not going to be as effective.

    but i have no idea on how much the weight will effect the natural freuquency, from experience on calculating natural frequency it doens't change that much with small changes of variables. but yeah woudl need to model it and see what the computer program spits out.

    and i think ive typed "natural frequency" enough times now....

    that make any sense?

    edit: grub screws? that sounds dodgy as! wanna hope you do them up straight or you'll throw the whole thing out of balance! why don't people get smaller pulleys for the supercharger end?
    In faith there is enough light for those who want to believe and enough shadows to blind those who don't.
    - Blaise Pascal

  2. #2
    Elite rthy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Name
    Leo
    State
    VIC
    Location
    Tulla
    Country
    Australia
    Posts
    7,308

    Default

    ok I don't know much about this but I would think that would be a pretty safe bet, assuming the grab screws can handle it
    30kw club

  3. #3
    Bad Email Address
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    222

    Default

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Sam_Q @ May 27 2008, 10:59 PM) </div>
    the first thing to go on a sr20det is the only, a lot of engineering has gone into the factory engine, they have engineered the engine to a point were it meets its warranty.

  4. #4
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Name
    David
    State
    QLD
    Location
    Ferny Grove
    Country
    Australia
    Posts
    3,670

    Default

    nice read

    i should weigh a factory item and my big pulley and check out the difference

    as for the grub screws, its all pressed together and the grub screws are there as a failsafe i guess.

  5. #5
    Junior Member toyomad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Name
    Jason
    State
    QLD
    Location
    Greenbank
    Country
    Australia
    Posts
    15

    Default

    whoops

  6. #6
    Veteran slydar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Name
    Dimitri
    State
    QLD
    Location
    Brisbane
    Country
    Australia
    Posts
    3,096

    Default

    i wouldn't run one.

    Chris O'Shanessy doesnt think its a good idea either, as far as I'm concerned, Chris is about as likely to know whats good for a 4a as anyone, not only with his experience but also with being in racing circles, and with using the engine builder he uses..

    i don't think the comparison to the rear strut brace is valid.

    1 thing.. (the strut brace) basically, can't really hurt anything.

    the other has the scientifically proven potential to damage your engine.

    i also don't think youll notice the difference.

    i can supply you a billet flywheel that will make a difference for about $400.
    78's

  7. #7
    Veteran Jonny Rochester's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Name
    Jonathan
    State
    TAS
    Location
    Hobart
    Country
    Australia
    Posts
    2,660

    Default

    I admit the stock harmonic balancer seams like a good idea, but a lighter flywheel/crank/pulley is also a good idea for better acceleration in a sports/race car. Also lighter static weight is an advantage also. I like to take off all the things I am not using on my car, so I have machined the A/C drive part off my stock pulley. The harmonic balancer part is retained. But I would just as soon use a solid aluminium one if it was lighter, and if I had the time/money to make/buy it.

    Consider this, Toyota engines in the 70s, such as 2T-G did not have a harmonic balancer. The crank pulley was solid.

    Another thought: I have seen a couple of 4A-FE engines with snapped cranks. The front of the crank where the pulley goes snaps off, with the standard setup.

  8. #8
    Elite rthy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Name
    Leo
    State
    VIC
    Location
    Tulla
    Country
    Australia
    Posts
    7,308

    Default

    slydar: thats not what I was saying at all, someone asked why would people fit them and I said "my point being people add stuff because they think it looks cool." he didnt ask what would go wrong, what it was like or what it was comparable to. Like usual I could of used some more carefull wording
    30kw club

  9. #9
    Elite rthy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Name
    Leo
    State
    VIC
    Location
    Tulla
    Country
    Australia
    Posts
    7,308

    Default

    "is the only"?

    typo?

    a lot of engineering and they couldnt even fit a proper oil fitting for the turbo instead of that stupid tapered system they have now that loves to strip out. Fine if you never touch it (during warranty) but you better watch out if your not careful and you work on it. From what I have seen typical nissan style of engineering, do something so right and some things so wrong. Also how is it a cheapish aftermarket kit thats main part is a pressed peice of spring steel can sopposedly stop the rockers failing no-where near as much exist? why isnt it stock? piss poor if you ask me.
    30kw club

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Name
    Andrew
    State
    VIC
    Location
    Melbourne
    Country
    Australia
    Posts
    447

    Default

    Lets make no mistake, Nissan engineering is bizarre at best. Does anyone remember the 3 litre diesels that (recent) that didn't run enough oil in the sump? Many blown motors. I think the resultant fix was to replace the dipstick with one that had the marks higher up to increase the amount of oil at "full".
    What a monumental fuck up!

    I have a D40 turbo diesel Navara, bought new but not my choice (i would have bought a hilux). It's a dog. Electronic 4X4 shit itself only time i really need it (wouldn't disengage, had to drive at 30kmh for 2 hours), turning circle is larger than the radius of the earth, needs front discs and pads every 40,000km regardless of how it's driven and they cost the same as the brakes in mum's 2006 mercedes 4x4 (which are about 40mm larger and last 80,000km). Also, abs light keeps coming on, dealership can't fix it (they are dills though. I suspect it's just a faulty wheel speed sensor). Speedo needle flaps to about 20km/h and back to zero when the car is stationary.

    On the plus side, it handles very, very well for the type of car it is, it uses 10L/km of diesel and the seats are very comfortable.

    I won't get another one............

    Oh, and i don't give a flying fuck how fast the new GTR is, it looks shit and it's too heavy/big. I sat in one when I was in Japan and it felt like I was in a Maxima. I'd rather an R34, rx7, NSX.

    EDIT: Sorry for the off topic.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 4AGE Corolla AE86 Lightweight Crank Pulley
    By belstaff in forum Ebay Items - My Stuff
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 4th January 2013, 10:47 PM
  2. 4AGE Corolla AE86 Lightweight Crank Pulley
    By belstaff in forum Car Parts For Sale
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 4th January 2013, 10:46 PM
  3. 100kw crank and 83 kw crank
    By lilmikemike in forum Technical - Questions
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 5th May 2010, 07:18 PM
  4. lightweight crank pully
    By enigma in forum Technical - Questions
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 23rd June 2009, 09:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •